lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49415EDB.3030006@computer.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:41:31 +0100
From:	Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Default offload settings in Ethernet drivers

Hi!

A discussion recently took place on the power mailing list on the 
subject of the impact of (hardware-assisted) offload functions on the 
power efficiency of the overall system.

The discussion was brought on by me noticing that not all drivers enable 
  all of their offload features by default (case in point: r8169).

Although the discussion may not be complete, early indications are that:

1. Hardware-assisted offloads improve power efficiency unless 
implemented in a separate CPU (TOE / Total Offloading);

2. It would probably be a good idea to enable hardware-assisted offloads 
other than TOE by default given the above.

I would therefore like to sollicit views here:

1. Would changing default offload settings in Ethernet drivers help to 
save the planet?

2. Which offload settings does it make sense to enable by default?


Thanks, Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ