[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081211105459.3e615be8@s6510>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:54:59 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Default offload settings in Ethernet drivers
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:41:31 +0100
Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A discussion recently took place on the power mailing list on the
> subject of the impact of (hardware-assisted) offload functions on the
> power efficiency of the overall system.
>
> The discussion was brought on by me noticing that not all drivers enable
> all of their offload features by default (case in point: r8169).
>
> Although the discussion may not be complete, early indications are that:
>
> 1. Hardware-assisted offloads improve power efficiency unless
> implemented in a separate CPU (TOE / Total Offloading);
>
> 2. It would probably be a good idea to enable hardware-assisted offloads
> other than TOE by default given the above.
>
> I would therefore like to sollicit views here:
>
> 1. Would changing default offload settings in Ethernet drivers help to
> save the planet?
>
> 2. Which offload settings does it make sense to enable by default?
Go get a kill-a-watt meter and real hardware and measure.
I don't think there will be any difference. Linux (mainline) doesn't
do TOE. It does do segmentation offload, and any driver that can
do segmentation offload enables it by default.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists