[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed82fe3e0901071217y44900869n7af2e99d6174fd45@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:17:04 -0600
From: "Timur Tabi" <timur@...escale.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, leoli@...escale.com, davem@...emloft.net,
galak@...nel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: use correct UCCE macros
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> wrote:
> This patch will break ucc_geth.c if my other patch, "powerpc: add Ethernet
> UPSMR definitions to QE library" isn't also applied. That patch is currently
> in Kumar's 'next' branch, so it will make 2.6.29-rc0. Therefore, it should
> be safe to apply this patch to 'net-next' today, with the understanding that
> everything will be peachy once Linus pulls everyone's 2.6.29 branches.
David,
as I mentioned here, Kumar already has the pre-req patch in his 'next'
branch (for 2.6.29), so if you apply this patch to your 'next',
ucc_geth.c will break until Linus pulls from Kumar and you pull from
Linus. I think that's OK.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists