| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20090108.111833.163761985.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:18:33 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: timur@...escale.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, leoli@...escale.com, galak@...nel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: use correct UCCE macros From: "Timur Tabi" <timur@...escale.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:17:04 -0600 > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> wrote: > > > This patch will break ucc_geth.c if my other patch, "powerpc: add Ethernet > > UPSMR definitions to QE library" isn't also applied. That patch is currently > > in Kumar's 'next' branch, so it will make 2.6.29-rc0. Therefore, it should > > be safe to apply this patch to 'net-next' today, with the understanding that > > everything will be peachy once Linus pulls everyone's 2.6.29 branches. > > David, > > as I mentioned here, Kumar already has the pre-req patch in his 'next' > branch (for 2.6.29), so if you apply this patch to your 'next', > ucc_geth.c will break until Linus pulls from Kumar and you pull from > Linus. I think that's OK. I think I'll wait for Kumar's stuff to hit Linus's tree, then apply this patch. The patch is safely stored in my inbox and patchwork so there is no need to fear it getting lost :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists