[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3tz8atxwv.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:00:00 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hdlc: fix compile problem
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> writes:
> It was introduced (by me) in previous patch. Since that isn't applied yet,
> I'll go back and fix.
I can see it now, I must have missed it because of the "synclink"
subject.
@@ -106,7 +98,7 @@ static int hdlc_device_event(struct noti
if (dev_net(dev) != &init_net)
return NOTIFY_DONE;
- if (dev->get_stats != hdlc_get_stats)
+ if (dev->header_ops != &hdlc_null_ops)
return NOTIFY_DONE; /* not an HDLC device */
This won't work because hdlc_null_ops may be substituted by
cisco_header_ops or ppp_header_ops. Current test works for now but is
wrong, too, at least for wanxl driver (it tries to use its
get_stats()).
Perhaps some
+ if (dev->header_ops->something != &something)
would do? Alternatively we can return to hdlc_carrier_on|off() and
hdlc_device_event() won't be needed.
Essentially, it's a bit hard to check if the device is one of ours if
we are the middle layer.
There are two layers here:
- hardware drivers (10+)
- protocol drivers (5 - hdlc* files)
Protocol drivers want to define things like:
- dev->header_ops (no problem)
- dev->change_mtu (perhaps)
- dev->hard_start_xmit
Hardware drivers need to define the rest of NDO.
Hmm, not much, only hard_start_xmit() is really problematic. I think
we need a trampoline: hw driver will define the NDO and set
hard_start_xmit and possibly change_mtu to (exported by hdlc.c)
hdlc_xmit (hdlc_change_mtu), and hdlc_start_xmit will just call
protocol's xmit().
We could also use it for the test in hdlc_device_event:
if (dev->netdev_ops->start_hard_xmit != hdlc_xmit)
If we could then get rid of this special xmit() and do all header and
TX preparations in hard_header(), it would be even better (cleaner)
though IIRC it requires some changes to Ethernet(?) code.
The changes have to be applied to the 4 synclink drivers and to most
.c files in drivers/net/wan simultaneously, perhaps it's more practical
if I do it?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists