[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4966C28B.6060304@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:20:43 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make possible speeds known to ethtool
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:12:01AM +0000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> The next release of ethtool is coming in about 4 weeks, and we can
>> definitely get something like this in there.
>
> Jeff, any chance you can stick this patch in there to add the GRO
> toggle?
>
> ethtool: Add GRO toggle
>
> This patch adds the -k toggles to query and set GRO on a device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>
> diff --git a/ethtool-copy.h b/ethtool-copy.h
> index eadba25..3ca4e2c 100644
> --- a/ethtool-copy.h
> +++ b/ethtool-copy.h
> @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ struct ethtool_rxnfc {
>
> #define ETHTOOL_GRXFH 0x00000029 /* Get RX flow hash configuration */
> #define ETHTOOL_SRXFH 0x0000002a /* Set RX flow hash configuration */
> +#define ETHTOOL_GGRO 0x0000002b /* Get GRO enable (ethtool_value) */
> +#define ETHTOOL_SGRO 0x0000002c /* Set GRO enable (ethtool_value) */
Ugh... is it too late to change this interface?
The person who added this should have used the new flags interface, and
added ETH_FLAG_GRO right next to the pre-existing ETH_FLAG_LRO.
It is incorrect to add new ioctls just to toggle a boolean value.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists