lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <8CB45DED3262281-2F30-8C9@webmail-stg-d07.sysops.aol.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:46:30 -0500 From: jpo234@...scape.net To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sending complete IPv6 packets without bypassing netfilter/IPsec Herbert, sorry for bothering you (and everybody else on the list) again. It seems that the stack does not replace a "::" source address with a real one when using a PF_INET6/SOCK_RAW/IPPROTO_RAW socket the way it does with an IP_HDRINCL IPv4 socket for "0.0.0.0". Do I have to fill this one myself or is there another trick to achieve this? Thanks and kind regards Joerg -----Original Message----- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: jpo234@...scape.net Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Sent: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 7:48 am Subject: Re: Sending complete IPv6 packets without bypassing netfilter/IPsec jpo234@...scape.net wrote: > > So, if you write "should have the same effect as IP_HDRINCL" does this > mean "this is the way we designed it in Linux, so it should work" or It's designed this way in Linux. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists