lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200901161256.15744.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:56:15 +0200 From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com> To: "ext jpo234@...scape.net" <jpo234@...scape.net> Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sending complete IPv6 packets without bypassing netfilter/IPsec On Friday 16 January 2009 12:46:30 ext jpo234@...scape.net, you wrote: > Herbert, > sorry for bothering you (and everybody else on the list) again. It > seems that the stack does not replace a "::" source address with a real > one when using a PF_INET6/SOCK_RAW/IPPROTO_RAW socket the way it does > with an IP_HDRINCL IPv4 socket for "0.0.0.0". Do I have to fill this > one myself Yes. That's the _whole_ point of writing the header yourself. > or is there another trick to achieve this? Use transport-layer raw sockets and let the kernel do the network header. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont Maemo Software, Nokia Devices R&D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists