[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1232376006.3004.19.camel@achroite>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:40:06 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sfc: Replace LRO with GRO
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 21:50 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:24:22 +1100
>
> > sfc: Replace LRO with GRO
> >
> > This patch makes sfc invoke the GRO hooks instead of LRO. As
> > GRO has a compatible external interface to LRO this is a very
> > straightforward replacement.
> >
> > Everything should appear identical to the user except that the
> > offload is now controlled by the GRO ethtool option instead of
> > LRO. I've kept the lro module parameter as is since that's for
> > compatibility only.
> >
> > I have eliminated efx_rx_mk_skb as the GRO layer can take care
> > of all packets regardless of whether GRO is enabled or not.
> >
> > So the only case where we don't call GRO is if the packet checksum
> > is absent. This is to keep the behaviour changes of the patch to
> > a minimum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>
> Applied for 2.6.30
Please could you push this and other GRO changes for .30 to
net-next-2.6?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists