[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1232646594.29087.88.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:49:53 +0200
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "Harvey Harrison" <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
cc: linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] bnx2x: further annotations
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:50 -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> No functional annotations, just documenting the status quo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
[...]
> @@ -9699,11 +9699,11 @@ static int bnx2x_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> bd_prod, ++nbd);
>
> pbd->lso_mss = cpu_to_le16(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size);
> - pbd->tcp_send_seq = swab32(tcp_hdr(skb)->seq);
> + pbd->tcp_send_seq = cpu_to_le32(be32_to_cpu(tcp_hdr(skb)->seq));
Hmmm.... That looks worse to me. Do we really need to replace swab with
cpu_to_le on top of be_to_cpu?
> pbd->tcp_flags = pbd_tcp_flags(skb);
>
> if (xmit_type & XMIT_GSO_V4) {
> - pbd->ip_id = swab16(ip_hdr(skb)->id);
> + pbd->ip_id = cpu_to_le16(be16_to_cpu(ip_hdr(skb)->id));
Same question
> pbd->tcp_pseudo_csum =
> swab16(~csum_tcpudp_magic(ip_hdr(skb)->saddr,
> ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists