[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1232648224.9701.53.camel@brick>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:17:04 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] bnx2x: further annotations
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 19:49 +0200, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:50 -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > No functional annotations, just documenting the status quo.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -9699,11 +9699,11 @@ static int bnx2x_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > bd_prod, ++nbd);
> >
> > pbd->lso_mss = cpu_to_le16(skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size);
> > - pbd->tcp_send_seq = swab32(tcp_hdr(skb)->seq);
> > + pbd->tcp_send_seq = cpu_to_le32(be32_to_cpu(tcp_hdr(skb)->seq));
>
> Hmmm.... That looks worse to me. Do we really need to replace swab with
> cpu_to_le on top of be_to_cpu?
Agreed that it is ugly, in a future patch I was thinking of changing tcp_send_seq
to just be treated as a be-value throughout the driver, or at least a cpu-endian.
These patches are more about documenting the status quo than making functional
changes like that, so I went with the somewhat ugly annotation for now. Once
the endian noise has been reduced, it will be a lot easier to make changes
without introducing bugs.
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists