[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49794612.9010204@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:22:42 -0600
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, olaf.kirch@...cle.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
kkeil@...e.de, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PANIC] lro + iscsi or lro + skb text search causes panic
Mike Christie wrote:
> Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
>>
>> skb_copy_bits is an example of the code flow that does work.
>>
>> skb_seq_read appears to only be used by iSCSI and the skb text match
>> support in tc/netfilter (aka skb_find_text)
>>
>
> There is no reason iscsi needs to use skb_seq_read. It used to use
> skb_copy_bits. I can convert iscsi to use skb_copy_bits again.
>
Attached is a patch made against the scsi maintainer's tree (I think it
should also apply to linus's) that converts iscsi to use skb_copy_bits.
It is lightly tested. If there is no benefit in having skb_find_text use
skb_seq_read maybe we can just kill it, so people do not have to
maintain two helpers that provide similar functionality.
View attachment "use-skb-copy-bits.patch" of type "text/plain" (4906 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists