[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497947AF.9030901@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:29:35 -0600
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, olaf.kirch@...cle.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
kkeil@...e.de, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PANIC] lro + iscsi or lro + skb text search causes panic
Mike Christie wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
>>>
>>> skb_copy_bits is an example of the code flow that does work.
>>>
>>> skb_seq_read appears to only be used by iSCSI and the skb text match
>>> support in tc/netfilter (aka skb_find_text)
>>>
>>
>> There is no reason iscsi needs to use skb_seq_read. It used to use
>> skb_copy_bits. I can convert iscsi to use skb_copy_bits again.
>>
>
> Attached is a patch made against the scsi maintainer's tree (I think it
> should also apply to linus's) that converts iscsi to use skb_copy_bits.
> It is lightly tested. If there is no benefit in having skb_find_text use
> skb_seq_read maybe we can just kill it, so people do not have to
> maintain two helpers that provide similar functionality.
>
There is a bug in this patch, but it just makes it a little less
efficient. It should not screw up testing to verify that the oops is fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists