[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497E44F6.2010703@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:19:18 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC: Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling"
>
> Hi Rick, nice hardware you have :)
Every once in a while the cobbler's children get some shoes to wear :)
>
> Stephen had a patch to nuke read_lock() from iptables, using RCU and seqlocks.
> I hit this contention point even with low cost hardware, and quite standard application.
>
> I pinged him few days ago to try to finish the job with him, but it seems Stephen
> is busy at the moment.
>
> Then conntrack (tcp sessions) is awfull, since it uses a single rwlock_t tcp_lock
> that must be write_locked() for basically every handled tcp frame...
>
> How long is "not indefinitely" ?
The system I am using is being borrowed under an open ended loan. However, my
use of it can be thought of as being the "null process" in VMS - once anyone else
wants it I have to get off of it.
That said, I would guess that the chances of someone else trying to get that
system are pretty small for the next four+ weeks. I had a similar system (PCIe
I/O rather than PCI-X) for quite a few weeks before it got pulled-out from under.
rick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists