[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497F457F.2050802@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:33:51 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling"
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> [PATCH] netfilter: Get rid of central rwlock in tcp conntracking
>
> TCP connection tracking suffers of huge contention on a global rwlock,
> used to protect tcp conntracking state.
>
> As each tcp conntrack state have no relations between each others, we
> can switch to fine grained lock. Using an array of spinlocks avoids
> enlarging size of connection tracking structures, yet giving reasonable
> fanout.
>
> tcp_print_conntrack() doesnt need to lock anything to read
> ct->proto.tcp.state, so speedup /proc/net/ip_conntrack as well.
>
> nf_conntrack_hash_rnd_initted & nf_conntrack_hash_rnd declared read_mostly
>
This looks good to me. Rick, would you like to give it a try?
I'll convert the remaining conntrack protocols when applying it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists