[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497F4C2F.9000804@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:02:23 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling"
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>>[PATCH] netfilter: Get rid of central rwlock in tcp conntracking
>>
>>TCP connection tracking suffers of huge contention on a global rwlock,
>>used to protect tcp conntracking state.
>>
>>As each tcp conntrack state have no relations between each others, we
>>can switch to fine grained lock. Using an array of spinlocks avoids
>>enlarging size of connection tracking structures, yet giving reasonable
>>fanout.
>>
>>tcp_print_conntrack() doesnt need to lock anything to read
>>ct->proto.tcp.state, so speedup /proc/net/ip_conntrack as well.
>>
>>nf_conntrack_hash_rnd_initted & nf_conntrack_hash_rnd declared read_mostly
>>
>
>
> This looks good to me. Rick, would you like to give it a try?
>
> I'll convert the remaining conntrack protocols when applying it.
I will give it a try and let folks know the results - unless told otherwise, I
will ass-u-me I only need rerun the "full_iptables" test case.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists