netdev - Re: [ofa-general] NetEffect, iw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adaljsvwbkm.fsf@cisco.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:05:29 -0800
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	aluno3@...zta.onet.pl, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] NetEffect, iw_nes and kernel warning

 > > but actually I still don't see how it's safe for a net driver to
 > > call skb_linearize() from its transmit routine, since there's a
 > > chance that that will unconditionally enable BHs?
 > 
 > It's simply not allowed.
 > 
 > dev_queue_xmit() at a higher level can do __skb_linearize()
 > because it does so before doing the rcu_read_lock_bh().

OK, thanks... what confused me is that several other drivers also do
skb_linearize() in their hard_start_xmit method... eg bnx2x,
via-velocity, mv643xx_eth.  So there are several other lurking bugs to
deal with here I guess.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html