netdev - Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] iproute2 : invalid burst/cburst calculation with hrtimers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:53:14 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] iproute2 : invalid burst/cburst calculation
   with hrtimers

Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 02/04/2009 10:20 PM:

> Denys Fedoryschenko wrote, On 02/02/2009 07:21 PM:
> 
>> Why floating point?
> 
> 
> Yes, floating point is not enough. get_hz() == 1000000000 could be
> a theoretical resolution, but I guess we don't expect to use this,
> even if it were possible. Since high resolution can schedule more
> often than 1000HZ, it seems these buffers could be set lower (10x,
> 100x?), but there should be some reasonable limit.


Anyway, it's rather a matter of tweaking. IMHO 1000HZ limit for setting
these defaults looks safe, so I think this patch is OK.

Jarek P.
 
>> It seems get_hz (and burst in result) just cannot be too low.
>> Still seems some code in HTB rely on jiffies, so get_hz() probably just wrong.
>>
>> Already i'm tried to increase burst/cburst calculation precision, but it will 
>> fail still with such high get_hz variable.
>>
>> Ii dont know way to get real HZ variable from userspace.
>>
>> Here is Martin Devera answer
>>> but it really
>>> seems as if get_hz() is too high.
>>> For 1000Mbps - it is 1MB per 1 ms and assuming HZ=1000, then burst
>>> should be about 1MB.
>>> But I must admit, I'm not familiar with latest state of HZ in kernel.
>>> There was "NO_NZ" effort IIRC, where the HZ granularity can be
>>> considerably finer - but still not infinite.
>>
>>
>> On Monday 02 February 2009 20:07:42 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:26:17 +0200
>>>
>>> Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb> wrote:
>>>> ------------->
>>>> iproute2 : invalid burst/cburst calculation with hrtimers
>>>>
>>>> If hrtimers on, /proc/net/psched shows 4th variable
>>>> as 1000000000
>>>> Because burst calculated by division rate to this variable,
>>>> it will be almost always zero. As result, we will get higher system
>>>> load on low rates, and on high rates shaper will not able to process
>>>> data. So it is kind of critical bugfix for systems with hrtimers.
>>>> It is checked and proved. Core 2 Quad was not able to
>>>> shape 200Mbps, and gave only 180-190. It is more safe to set it
>>>> to 1000HZ. If user wants, he can set custom "env" HZ variable.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> I would rather this be converted to floating point.
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html