netdev - Re: Remaining bits for basic support of LDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090210213712.GB19041@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:37:12 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Remaining bits for basic support of LDP

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:02:02PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Yeah, the smsc updates for omap might take a while longer to get going.
> So here's my ack for this smc911x patch:
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Thanks.

> For the smsc changes, I don't have an LDP to test with. But I'll try
> to get another board to work with smsc now that I have some MMC voltage
> weirdness out of the way and have a proper root on MMC :) That is after
> I have musb working on it so I can scp the module over g_ether..

I've tested them both on the LDP, both work fine.

That talk of MMC voltage weirdness sounds like bug fixes - do they
need to get into mainline?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html