[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499562C6.3060001@br.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:08:38 -0200
From: André Detsch <adetsch@...ibm.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] Fix link test for e1000 and e1000e when
iface is down
Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> I guess this comes down to what the definition of a Link test should
> be doing. My $0.02 is that it should be testing if the interface has
> a link, in which case if you ifdown the interface before running the
> Link test, I would expect it to fail.
>
> With this patch, if you bring down the device and run the ethtool diag
> tests, the Link test would come back as passing which is something I
> would not expect.
With the current code, e1000_reset is called during the test anyway, so
ethtool -t fails only the first time it is run (after ifconfig down). Is that
the expected behavior for the test?
# ifconfig eth0 up; ifconfig eth0 down; ethtool -t eth0
The test result is FAIL
The test extra info:
Register test (offline) 0
Eeprom test (offline) 0
Interrupt test (offline) 0
Loopback test (offline) 0
Link test (on/offline) 1
# ethtool -t eth0
The test result is PASS
The test extra info:
Register test (offline) 0
Eeprom test (offline) 0
Interrupt test (offline) 0
Loopback test (offline) 0
Link test (on/offline) 0
Thanks for the feedback.
--
André Detsch
Kernel Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center Brazil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists