[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <499973DC.3000208@netfilter.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:10:36 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: add NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR socket option
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
>> index 6ee69c2..29dd4fb 100644
>> --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
>> +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct netlink_sock {
>>
>> #define NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET 0x1
>> #define NETLINK_RECV_PKTINFO 0x2
>> +#define NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR 0x4
>
> The name seems to imply send twice (send/report).
Indeed. I didn't like this initial name a lot.
>> static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> @@ -994,13 +995,15 @@ static inline int do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
>> if (p->skb2 == NULL) {
>> netlink_overrun(sk);
>> /* Clone failed. Notify ALL listeners. */
>> - p->failure = 1;
>> + if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR)
>> + p->failure = 1;
>
> This doesn't make sense. *Other* sockets get skipped only iff
> this socket had the error-report flag set? This should be done
> in a consistent manner, which means either not set the failure
> flag at all and retry for all sockets, or set it for any failed
> socket delivery and determine the return value based on whether
> one of the skipped sockets had the error-report flag set.
I can add a check for the flag to allow sockets without the flag set to
try to send the message:
if ((nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_ERROR) && p->failure) {
netlink_overrun(sk);
goto out;
}
Still, this "skip" behaviour looks to me strange. I don't see why a
socket should skip if other socket's clone failed. Wouldn't it be better
to remove this?
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists