netdev - Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100: race between isr_indicate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200902240836.42948.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:36:42 +0100
From:	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>
To:	Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>,
	"ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100: race between isr_indicate_associated and rx path

Am Montag, 23. Februar 2009 schrieb Jouni Malinen:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:38:57AM +0100, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> 
> > Jouni, would you accept a patch for wpa_supplicant that adds some retries
> > to l2_packet_send when the network stack returns an error?

[...]

> I did not fully understand the details of the issue and why noop_qdisc
> is used at the point when a frame is delivered to user space, so I may
> be missing some details here. Anyway, I would highly prefer the kernel
> to avoid delivering EAPOL frames into user space if it is not ready to
> transmit a response to them.

Sounds reasonable to me.

Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html