[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200902241315.43128.helmut.schaa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:15:42 +0100
From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2100: race between isr_indicate_associated and rx path
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 schrieb Zhu Yi:
[...]
> Thanks for the analysis. Are you sure noop_qdisc is still used when we
> are about to netif_carrier_on() after receiving the association success
> response?
Yes, had a printk in noop_enqueue.
> From dev_open(), dev_activate() is called after netdev->open.
> So the txq->qdisc_sleeping should be already replaced with pfifo_fast.
> But the state is still DEACTIVATED.
Right. But for example when a connection cannot be established by ipw2100
it will call netif_carrier_off on disassociation which in turn leads to a
call to dev_deavtivate. Hence, it is possible that a noop_qdisc is
assigned while the device is up and carrier is off.
> Should the packet from
> wpa_supplicant be dropped by dev_queue_xmit()?
>
> > So, how should I proceed here?
> >
> > Some possibilities that come to mind:
> >
> > 1) let the noop_qdisc return NET_XMIT_DROP instead of NET_XMIT_CN and extend
> > wpa_supplicant to retry after a short timeout. Already tried this approach
> > and it works fine for me. wpa_supplicant typically needs one retry (200ms
> > delay) until the frame is successfully send out.
> >
> > 2) Run activate_dev somehow without a delay. I guess this could be achieved by
> > changing linkwatch_urgent_event. I haven't tested this yet. But I guess we
> > would still have a small race here.
> >
> > 3) Wait until activate_dev was called in ipw2100 before replaying the cached
> > frames.
>
> I think making a sync version of netif_carrier_on/activate_dev should be
> the way to go. This could be a requirement from wireless. In wired
> network, netif_carrier_on() is called after a network cable plug event
> is detected. Some delay should be OK.
Maybe, but I can imagine a similar race when using a wired 802.1x secured
network. The switch might send an EAP-request very quickly after the carrier
was detected.
> But in wireless,
> netif_carrier_on() is usually called after an association is succeeded.
> The driver has already some management frames transfered with AP. Now
> it's the time to open the data frame transmission. The driver requires
> to get the activate_dev() result (synchronously or via callback) because
> otherwise the driver has no idea when the Qdisc is ready and then it can
> start to deliver data frames to network stack and user space.
Exactly.
[...]
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists