netdev - Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:14:39 -0700
From:	Gary Thomas <gary@...assoc.com>
To:	jdb@...x.dk
CC:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?

Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 11:56 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> 
>> You should write 0x003E ... see attached patch
> 
> Ups, I see (from the thread) that you have already done/tried this...
> 

Yes, although I think it will need some work in the future
(I've set it to 1000Mb connection, you said you used 100Mb, etc)

Question: I'm testing this by trying a ping out of my box.
Linux replies by sending an ARP packet out, and the destination
replies with an ARP packet in.  I can see from the ethtool stats
that the reply packets get into lan1.1 (the physical port I'm
using), but I don't see them get moved through the CPU port.
My understanding is that this should work via the VLAN map?
I checked that setup and it looks OK.

Any ideas where this might be going wrong?

Thanks

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html