netdev - HTB vs HFSC, HTB is highly inaccurate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200903082045.39083.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:45:39 +0200
From:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: HTB vs HFSC, HTB is highly inaccurate

Hi again

I test again HTB and HFSC, this time in very simple case.

Regarding HTB - i try without quantum, with different values, without and with 
cburst (big and small), with HZ=1000 and default, hysteresis on and off - it 
is almost same result. 

While i set limit at 57, it can reach 61. HFSC results is perfect.

Here is graph snapshopts.
http://www.nuclearcat.com/netdev/htb-problem.png
You can see points where HTB enabled. Other points if HFSC.

Scripts source is:

HTB http://www.nuclearcat.com/netdev/htb-script.txt
HFSC http://www.nuclearcat.com/netdev/hfsc-script.txt

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html