[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090309080700.GA4760@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:07:00 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HTB vs HFSC, HTB is highly inaccurate
On 08-03-2009 19:45, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote:
> Hi again
>
> I test again HTB and HFSC, this time in very simple case.
>
> Regarding HTB - i try without quantum, with different values, without and with
> cburst (big and small), with HZ=1000 and default, hysteresis on and off - it
> is almost same result.
>
> While i set limit at 57, it can reach 61. HFSC results is perfect.
>
> Here is graph snapshopts.
> http://www.nuclearcat.com/netdev/htb-problem.png
> You can see points where HTB enabled. Other points if HFSC.
Very nice picture, but some tc snapshot stats for qdisc and classes
would be appreciated.
>
> Scripts source is:
>
> HTB http://www.nuclearcat.com/netdev/htb-script.txt
| echo "class add dev eth0.37 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 40Mbit ceil 56Mbit burst 16000b cburst 16000b quantum 16000"
| echo "class add dev eth0.37 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate 26Mbit ceil 56Mbit burst 16000b cburst 16000b quantum 16000"
I guess you should try with rates 40/16 or 30/26 here.
BTW, it doesn't matter here, but for various reasons it's better to
add classes before filters pointing these classes.
> HFSC http://www.nuclearcat.com/netdev/hfsc-script.txt
This link doesn't work for me.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists