[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B78A4D.4060703@netfilter.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:54:21 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Subject: Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Passive OS fingerprinting netfilter module allows to passively detect
> remote OS and perform various netfilter actions based on that knowledge.
> This module compares some data (WS, MSS, options and it's order, ttl, df
> and others) from packets with SYN bit set with dynamically loaded OS
> fingerprints.
>
> Fingerprint matching rules can be downloaded from OpenBSD source tree
> and loaded via netlink connector into the kernel via special util found
> in archive. It will also listen for events about matching packets.
I like this feature. We have nfnetlink so I don't see why we should use
the netlink connector instead.
BTW, is there any difference with regards to userspace p0f apart from
having this integrated into iptables?
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists