[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090311100038.GA9560@ioremap.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:00:38 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Subject: Re: Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.
Hi Pablo.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:54:21AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso (pablo@...filter.org) wrote:
> > Fingerprint matching rules can be downloaded from OpenBSD source tree
> > and loaded via netlink connector into the kernel via special util found
> > in archive. It will also listen for events about matching packets.
>
> I like this feature. We have nfnetlink so I don't see why we should use
> the netlink connector instead.
OSF exists about 6 years already, netlink configuration was added in
2005, I do not remember if nfnetlink existed those days (IIRC it did
not, since I reused ULOG netlink first), right now I just cleanup
what was written before.
> BTW, is there any difference with regards to userspace p0f apart from
> having this integrated into iptables?
There should be no major differences, there are some tweaks for the
MTU comparison, maybe something else.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists