[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090313.160258.151176507.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	denys@...p.net.lb
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict
 verification
From: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:44:45 +0200
> Windows (XP at least) hosts on boot, with configured static ip, performing 
> address conflict detection, which is defined in RFC3927.
> Here is quote of important information:
> 
> "
> An ARP announcement is identical to the ARP Probe described above, 
> except    that now the sender and target IP addresses are both set 
> to the host's newly selected IPv4 address. 
> "
> 
> But it same time this goes wrong with RFC5227.
> "
> The 'sender IP address' field MUST be set to all zeroes; this is to avoid
> polluting ARP caches in other hosts on the same link in the case
> where the address turns out to be already in use by another host.
> "
> 
> When ARP proxy configured, it must not answer to both cases, because 
> it is address conflict verification in any case. For Windows it is just 
> causing to detect false "ip conflict". Already there is code for RFC5227, so 
> just trivially we just check also if source ip == target ip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Patch applied to net-next-2.6
Although, It's a shame that I had to munge such a simple patch so
much, between the bad comment formatting and the trailing whitespace
characters.
Please be mindful of this in future patch submissions.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
