[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090314131951.GA6080@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:19:51 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: therbert@...gle.com, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2: Patch 1/3] net: hand off skb list to other cpu to
submit to upper layer
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 07:19:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:24:10 -0700
>
> > Enabling HW multi-queue has somewhat higher CPU
> > utilization though, the extra device interrupt load is not coming for
> > free. We actually use the HW multi-queue in conjunction with our
> > software steering to get maximum pps (about 20% more).
>
> This is a non-intuitive observation. Using HW multiqueue should be
> cheaper than doing it in software, right?
Shared caches can play games with the numbers, we need to look
at this a bit more.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists