[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903161343.13894.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:43:13 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: pktoss@...il.com, dcbw@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make virtio_net support carrier detection
On Monday 16 March 2009 13:28:06 David Miller wrote:
> > Or should all devices which can't detect carrier set it to on, so
> > older NetworkManagers work?
>
> It is my opinion that this is the only correct behavior.
>
> If you don't know, it's on. Because "on" means "usable". And you
> can't fault NetworkManager or any other tool for making that kind of
> decision.
Yes, I agree that NM has to assume unknown == on. But I still think the
kernel is right as it is to return -EOPNOTSUPP and let userspace deal with it.
"Let's fix broken userspace in the kernel" arguments make me nervous ;)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists