[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090315.201353.57364397.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: emil.s.tantilov@...el.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel panic during stress with igb in the upstream kernel
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:52:45 +0800
> Sorry, it seems that I've managed to get the net/net-next patches
> mixed up. Does this help?
Actually I introduced this problem when I did the net-2.6
--> net-next-2.6 merge when your netpoll fix went it. :-/
> GRO: Move netpoll checks to correct location
>
> As my netpoll fix for net doesn't really work for net-next, we
> need this update to move the checks into the right place. As it
> stands we may pass freed skbs to netpoll_receive_skb.
>
> This patch also introduces a netpoll_rx_on function to avoid GRO
> completely if we're invoked through netpoll. This might seem
> paranoid but as netpoll may have an external receive hook it's
> better to be safe than sorry. I don't think we need this for
> 2.6.29 though since there's nothing immediately broken by it.
>
> This patch also moves the GRO_* return values to netdevice.h since
> VLAN needs them too (I tried to avoid this originally but alas
> this seems to be the easiest way out). This fixes a bug in VLAN
> where it continued to use the old return value 2 instead of the
> correct GRO_DROP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists