netdev - Re: [patch] xfrm: spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	cebbert@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] xfrm: spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in
 xfrm_state.c

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:16:54 +0800

> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 06:58:45PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > xfrm: spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state.c
> > 
> > spin_lock() should be spin_unlock() in xfrm_state_walk_done().
> > 
> > caused by:
> > commit 12a169e7d8f4b1c95252d8b04ed0f1033ed7cfe2
> > "ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list"
> > 
> > Reported-by: Marc Milgram <mmilgram@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
 ...
> Good catch!

Applied and queued to -stable.

I can't believe nobody hit this in all of this time :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html