[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090327.003819.234492275.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jpirko@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fubar@...ibm.com,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kaber@...sh.net,
mschmidt@...hat.com, dada1@...mosbay.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: allow bond in mode balance-alb to work
properly in bridge -try4
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:52:06 +0100
> (resend, updated changelog, hook moved into skb_bond_should_drop,
> skb_bond_should_drop ifdefed)
>
> Hi all.
>
> The problem is described in following bugzilla:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487763
...
> This patch solves the situation in the bonding without touching bridge code,
> as Patrick suggested. For every incoming frame to bonding it searches the
> destination address in slaves list and if any of slave addresses matches, it
> rewrites the address in frame by the adress of bonding master. This ensures that
> all frames comming thru the bonding in alb mode have the same address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
I don't like the hook, but if that's how it's best done....
Patrick, please review this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists