[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090330125156.GE3438@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:52:00 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
fubar@...ibm.com, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
mschmidt@...hat.com, dada1@...mosbay.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: allow bond in mode balance-alb to work
properly in bridge -try4
Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:47:59PM CEST, kaber@...sh.net wrote:
> Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Currently I'm thinking the way. What I have on mind:
>> I would like to add a list into struct net_device to contain all mac addresses
>> of the device. I would also like to use similar interface to handle them as
>> currently is for uc_list and mc_list. However I do not like that these lists are
>> not using standard list_head but they are propriate lists only for this purpose.
>> I'm thinking about converting them to use list_head first. Or maybe ignore them
>> and do the new list for macs in parallel?
>
> Using list_heads in the address lists would require some pretty large
> amount of work since you'd need to convert all the drivers.
Yes, I'm aware of it...
> I'm all
> in favour of doing this, but I wouldn't make the fix depend on that
> work.
ok so you are suggesting to use the current list struct?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists