[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D0C1E5.6080906@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:58:13 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
fubar@...ibm.com, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
mschmidt@...hat.com, dada1@...mosbay.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: allow bond in mode balance-alb to work properly
in bridge -try4
Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:47:59PM CEST, kaber@...sh.net wrote:
>> Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Currently I'm thinking the way. What I have on mind:
>>> I would like to add a list into struct net_device to contain all mac addresses
>>> of the device. I would also like to use similar interface to handle them as
>>> currently is for uc_list and mc_list. However I do not like that these lists are
>>> not using standard list_head but they are propriate lists only for this purpose.
>>> I'm thinking about converting them to use list_head first. Or maybe ignore them
>>> and do the new list for macs in parallel?
>> Using list_heads in the address lists would require some pretty large
>> amount of work since you'd need to convert all the drivers.
>
> Yes, I'm aware of it...
>> I'm all
>> in favour of doing this, but I wouldn't make the fix depend on that
>> work.
>
> ok so you are suggesting to use the current list struct?
Whatever will make this easier :) You could of course already add the
new structure and use it for your new list and do the conversion of
the existing structures on top of that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists