[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155d92380904020508vffc0480j3973973fd4e97fce@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:38:09 +0530
From: Sajith P V <sajithpv@...il.com>
To: Alan Carvalho de Assis <acassis@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i.MX31: Fixing cs89x0 network building to i.MX31ADS
Hi Alan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Alan Carvalho de Assis
<acassis@...il.com> wrote:
> It is strange, here I got a similar message:
> cs89x0:cs89x0_probe(0x0)
> cs89x0.c: v2.4.3-pre1 Russell Nelson <nelson@...nwr.com>, Andrew Morton
> eth0: cs8900 rev K found at 0xf4020300 [Cirrus EEPROM]
> cs89x0 media RJ-45, IRQ 168, programmed I/O, MAC 00:04:9f:00:41:87
> cs89x0_probe1() successful
> cs89x0:cs89x0_probe(0x0)
> cs89x0: request_region(0xf4020300, 0x10) failed
> cs89x0: no cs8900 or cs8920 detected. Be sure to disable PnP with SETUP
>
> But network works fine:
> $ ping 10.29.240.182
> PING 10.29.240.182 (10.29.240.182): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 10.29.240.182: seq=0 ttl=63 time=0.6 ms
> 64 bytes from 10.29.240.182: seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.6 ms
>
What is cs8900_irq_map set to with this patch or am I missing some thing?
Regards,
Sajith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists