[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37367b3a0904070652w48d2e269xf1e4b2cf88058a1d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:52:50 -0300
From: Alan Carvalho de Assis <acassis@...il.com>
To: Sajith P V <sajithpv@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i.MX31: Fixing cs89x0 network building to i.MX31ADS
Hi Sajith,
On 4/2/09, Sajith P V <sajithpv@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Alan
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Alan Carvalho de Assis
> <acassis@...il.com> wrote:
>> It is strange, here I got a similar message:
>> cs89x0:cs89x0_probe(0x0)
>> cs89x0.c: v2.4.3-pre1 Russell Nelson <nelson@...nwr.com>, Andrew Morton
>> eth0: cs8900 rev K found at 0xf4020300 [Cirrus EEPROM]
>> cs89x0 media RJ-45, IRQ 168, programmed I/O, MAC 00:04:9f:00:41:87
>> cs89x0_probe1() successful
>> cs89x0:cs89x0_probe(0x0)
>> cs89x0: request_region(0xf4020300, 0x10) failed
>> cs89x0: no cs8900 or cs8920 detected. Be sure to disable PnP with SETUP
>>
>> But network works fine:
>> $ ping 10.29.240.182
>> PING 10.29.240.182 (10.29.240.182): 56 data bytes
>> 64 bytes from 10.29.240.182: seq=0 ttl=63 time=0.6 ms
>> 64 bytes from 10.29.240.182: seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.6 ms
>>
>
> What is cs8900_irq_map set to with this patch or am I missing some thing?
>
Sorry my delay.
Please find definition below:
unsigned int cs8900_irq_map[] = { CS8900AIRQ, 0, 0, 0 };
/*! This is System IRQ used by CS8900A for interrupt generation taken
from platform.h */
#define CS8900AIRQ EXPIO_INT_ENET_INT
#define EXPIO_INT_ENET_INT (MXC_EXP_IO_BASE + 8)
> Regards,
> Sajith
>
Best Regards,
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists