netdev - Re: [PATCH] TX_RING and packet mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1239112067.32737.51.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:47:47 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Johann Baudy <johann.baudy@...-log.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX_RING and packet mmap

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:04 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:

> Well through tc ipt actions you can invoke arbitrary netfilter
> targets, including MARK --set-mark.

I thought you were saying this issue can be solved by 
tc/mark but you meant tc/mark is one culprit;->
Solvable by making sure tc/mark is not used in the system
you are running an app using this feature.

But the superset of what Johann wants seems to be a common 
issue: identifying _precisely_ when the skb sent out is done 
with - in his case, so he can use some field to lookup a table.
Other times i have seen people ask for it is for tun/tap 
notification in user space when a packet sent actually went out.

> In fact I've never really liked tc ipt actions since it doesn't
> do any sanity checking on the packet before invoking the target
> while normally netfitler does quite a bit of sanity checking.

more could be done in user space if you really need it.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html