[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090415142320.GA12193@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:23:20 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui@...il.com>, odie@...aau.dk,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, lguest@...abs.org,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lguest] [PATCH 4/5] lguest: use KVM hypercalls
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 07:18:44AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> My gut feel is that the socket needs to live in tun_file. Instead
> of in tun_struct. Making that change looked just tricky enough
> I couldn't sort through it when I glanced at the tun code, after I noticed
> you had added a socket.
Referring to tun_file to get sk_sleep is just too error-prone.
Unlike the transmit direction, the receive direction does not
present itself to the easy xmit lock solution that's currently
used to make tun_detach atomic.
The receive callback that currently uses sk_sleep can happen
anywhere.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists