netdev - Re: Oops in tun: bisected to Limit amount of queued packets per device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:30:38 +0200
From:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops in tun: bisected to  Limit amount of queued packets per device

Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> writes:

> No, I was booting up a guest and the guest sent its first packet (arp). I 
> forgot to mention, that the tap device is persistent and attached to a 
> bridge. Does that give a clue?

Being persistent appears to make the difference.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html