| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:58:50 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive spinlock (v6)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 06:10:30PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
>
> > Well, we don't really need an rwlock, especially given that we really
> > don't want two "readers" incrementing the same counter concurrently.
> >
> > A safer approach would be to maintain a flag in the task structure
> > tracking which (if any) of the per-CPU locks you hold. Also maintain
> > a recursion-depth counter. If the flag says you don't already hold
> > the lock, set it and acquire the lock. Either way, increment the
> > recursion-depth counter:
> >
> > if (current->netfilter_lock_held != cur_cpu) {
> > BUG_ON(current->netfilter_lock_held != CPU_NONE);
> > spin_lock(per_cpu(..., cur_cpu));
> > current->netfilter_lock_held = cur_cpu;
> > }
> > current->netfilter_lock_nesting++;
> >
> > And reverse the process to unlock:
> >
> > if (--current->netfilter_lock_nesting == 0) {
> > spin_unlock(per_cpu(..., cur_cpu));
> > current->netfilter_lock_held = CPU_NONE;
> > }
> >
>
> Yes, you are right, we can avoid rwlock, but use a 'recursive' lock
> or spin_trylock()
>
> We can use one counter close to the spinlock,
> no need to add one or two fields to every "thread_info"
>
> struct rec_lock {
> spinlock_t lock;
> int count;
> };
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rec_lock, ip_tables_lock);
Yep, much better approach!
> I also considered using regular spinlocks and spin_trylock() to "detect"
> the recurse case without a global counter.
>
> lock :
> local_bh_disable();
> int locked = spin_trylock(&__get_cpu_var(arp_tables_lock);
Hmmm...
What happens if some other CPU is actually holding the lock? For
example, the updater?
> unlock:
>
> if (likely(locked))
> spin_unlock(&__get_cpu_var(arp_tables_lock));
> local_bh_enable();
>
> But we would lose some runtime features, I dont feel comfortable about
> this trylock version. What others people think ?
I do not believe that it actually works.
I much prefer your earlier idea of associating a counter with the lock.
But an owner field is also required, please see below. Or please let me
know what I am missing.
Thanx, Paul
> Here is the resulting patch, based on Stephen v4
>
> (Not sure we *need* recursive spinlock for the arp_tables, but it seems
> better to have an uniform implementation)
>
>
> [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive spinlock (v6)
>
> Yet another alternative version of ip/ip6/arp tables locking using
> per-cpu locks. This avoids the overhead of synchronize_net() during
> update but still removes the expensive rwlock in earlier versions.
>
> The idea for this came from an earlier version done by Eric Dumazet.
> Locking is done per-cpu, the fast path locks on the current cpu
> and updates counters. The slow case involves acquiring the locks on
> all cpu's.
>
> The mutex that was added for 2.6.30 in xt_table is unnecessary since
> there already is a mutex for xt[af].mutex that is held.
>
> We have to use recursive spinlocks because netfilter can sometimes
> nest several calls to ipt_do_table() for a given cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h | 5 -
> net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 131 +++++++++------------------
> net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 130 +++++++++-----------------
> net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 127 +++++++++-----------------
> net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 26 -----
> 5 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 281 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
> index 7b1a652..1ff1a76 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
> @@ -354,9 +354,6 @@ struct xt_table
> /* What hooks you will enter on */
> unsigned int valid_hooks;
>
> - /* Lock for the curtain */
> - struct mutex lock;
> -
> /* Man behind the curtain... */
> struct xt_table_info *private;
>
> @@ -434,8 +431,6 @@ extern void xt_proto_fini(struct net *net, u_int8_t af);
>
> extern struct xt_table_info *xt_alloc_table_info(unsigned int size);
> extern void xt_free_table_info(struct xt_table_info *info);
> -extern void xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(struct xt_table_info *old,
> - struct xt_table_info *new);
>
> /*
> * This helper is performance critical and must be inlined
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
> index 5ba533d..9f935f2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
> @@ -231,6 +231,12 @@ static inline struct arpt_entry *get_entry(void *base, unsigned int offset)
> return (struct arpt_entry *)(base + offset);
> }
>
> +struct rec_lock {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + int count; /* recursion count */
We also need an owner field:
int owner;
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rec_lock, arp_tables_lock);
> +
> unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int hook,
> const struct net_device *in,
> @@ -246,6 +252,7 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> void *table_base;
> const struct xt_table_info *private;
> struct xt_target_param tgpar;
> + struct rec_lock *rl;
>
> if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, arp_hdr_len(skb->dev)))
> return NF_DROP;
> @@ -255,7 +262,12 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> rcu_read_lock_bh();
> private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
> - table_base = rcu_dereference(private->entries[smp_processor_id()]);
> +
> + rl = &__get_cpu_var(arp_tables_lock);
> + if (likely(rl->count++ == 0))
> + spin_lock(&rl->lock);
But if some other CPU holds the lock, this code would fail to wait for
that other CPU to release the lock, right? It also might corrupt the
rl->count field due to two CPUs accessing it concurrently non-atomically.
I suggest the following, preferably in a function or macro or something:
cur_cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (likely(rl->owner != cur_cpu) {
spin_lock(&rl->lock);
rl->owner = smp_processor_id();
rl->count = 1;
} else {
rl->count++;
}
And the inverse for unlock.
Or am I missing something subtle?
> +
> + table_base = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
>
> e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
> back = get_entry(table_base, private->underflow[hook]);
> @@ -273,6 +285,7 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> hdr_len = sizeof(*arp) + (2 * sizeof(struct in_addr)) +
> (2 * skb->dev->addr_len);
> +
> ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, hdr_len, 1);
>
> t = arpt_get_target(e);
> @@ -328,7 +341,8 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> e = (void *)e + e->next_offset;
> }
> } while (!hotdrop);
> -
> + if (likely(--rl->count == 0))
> + spin_unlock(&rl->lock);
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> if (hotdrop)
> @@ -716,74 +730,25 @@ static void get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
> curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> i = 0;
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(arp_tables_lock, curcpu).lock);
> ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[curcpu],
> t->size,
> set_entry_to_counter,
> counters,
> &i);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(arp_tables_lock, curcpu).lock);
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> if (cpu == curcpu)
> continue;
> i = 0;
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(arp_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
> t->size,
> add_entry_to_counter,
> counters,
> &i);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -
> -/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
> - * and everything is OK. */
> -static int
> -add_counter_to_entry(struct arpt_entry *e,
> - const struct xt_counters addme[],
> - unsigned int *i)
> -{
> - ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
> -
> - (*i)++;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* Take values from counters and add them back onto the current cpu */
> -static void put_counters(struct xt_table_info *t,
> - const struct xt_counters counters[])
> -{
> - unsigned int i, cpu;
> -
> - local_bh_disable();
> - cpu = smp_processor_id();
> - i = 0;
> - ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
> - t->size,
> - add_counter_to_entry,
> - counters,
> - &i);
> - local_bh_enable();
> -}
> -
> -static inline int
> -zero_entry_counter(struct arpt_entry *e, void *arg)
> -{
> - e->counters.bcnt = 0;
> - e->counters.pcnt = 0;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -clone_counters(struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const struct xt_table_info *info)
> -{
> - unsigned int cpu;
> - const void *loc_cpu_entry = info->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
> -
> - memcpy(newinfo, info, offsetof(struct xt_table_info, entries));
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - memcpy(newinfo->entries[cpu], loc_cpu_entry, info->size);
> - ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(newinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->size,
> - zero_entry_counter, NULL);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(arp_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -792,7 +757,6 @@ static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
> unsigned int countersize;
> struct xt_counters *counters;
> struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
> - struct xt_table_info *info;
>
> /* We need atomic snapshot of counters: rest doesn't change
> * (other than comefrom, which userspace doesn't care
> @@ -802,30 +766,11 @@ static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
> counters = vmalloc_node(countersize, numa_node_id());
>
> if (counters == NULL)
> - goto nomem;
> -
> - info = xt_alloc_table_info(private->size);
> - if (!info)
> - goto free_counters;
> -
> - clone_counters(info, private);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - mutex_lock(&table->lock);
> - xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(private, info);
> - synchronize_net(); /* Wait until smoke has cleared */
> -
> - get_counters(info, counters);
> - put_counters(private, counters);
> - mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
> -
> - xt_free_table_info(info);
> + get_counters(private, counters);
>
> return counters;
> -
> - free_counters:
> - vfree(counters);
> - nomem:
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> static int copy_entries_to_user(unsigned int total_size,
> @@ -1165,6 +1110,19 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
> + * and everything is OK. */
> +static int
> +add_counter_to_entry(struct arpt_entry *e,
> + const struct xt_counters addme[],
> + unsigned int *i)
> +{
> + ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
> +
> + (*i)++;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
> int compat)
> {
> @@ -1173,7 +1131,7 @@ static int do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
> struct xt_counters *paddc;
> unsigned int num_counters;
> const char *name;
> - int size;
> + int cpu, size;
> void *ptmp;
> struct xt_table *t;
> const struct xt_table_info *private;
> @@ -1224,25 +1182,25 @@ static int do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
> goto free;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&t->lock);
> private = t->private;
> if (private->number != num_counters) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock_up_free;
> }
>
> - preempt_disable();
> - i = 0;
> /* Choose the copy that is on our node */
> - loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
> + cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(arp_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> + loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[cpu];
> + i = 0;
> ARPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_entry,
> private->size,
> add_counter_to_entry,
> paddc,
> &i);
> - preempt_enable();
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(arp_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> +
> unlock_up_free:
> - mutex_unlock(&t->lock);
>
> xt_table_unlock(t);
> module_put(t->me);
> @@ -1923,7 +1881,10 @@ static struct pernet_operations arp_tables_net_ops = {
>
> static int __init arp_tables_init(void)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int cpu, ret;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(arp_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
>
> ret = register_pernet_subsys(&arp_tables_net_ops);
> if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
> index 810c0b6..1368b6d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,12 @@ static void trace_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> #endif
>
> +struct rec_lock {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + int count; /* recursion count */
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rec_lock, ip_tables_lock);
> +
> /* Returns one of the generic firewall policies, like NF_ACCEPT. */
> unsigned int
> ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -317,6 +323,7 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct xt_table_info *private;
> struct xt_match_param mtpar;
> struct xt_target_param tgpar;
> + struct rec_lock *rl;
>
> /* Initialization */
> ip = ip_hdr(skb);
> @@ -341,7 +348,12 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> rcu_read_lock_bh();
> private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
> - table_base = rcu_dereference(private->entries[smp_processor_id()]);
> +
> + rl = &__get_cpu_var(ip_tables_lock);
> + if (likely(rl->count++ == 0))
> + spin_lock(&rl->lock);
> +
> + table_base = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
>
> e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
>
> @@ -436,7 +448,8 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> e = (void *)e + e->next_offset;
> }
> } while (!hotdrop);
> -
> + if (likely(--rl->count == 0))
> + spin_unlock(&rl->lock);
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> #ifdef DEBUG_ALLOW_ALL
> @@ -902,75 +915,25 @@ get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
> curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> i = 0;
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(ip_tables_lock, curcpu).lock);
> IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[curcpu],
> t->size,
> set_entry_to_counter,
> counters,
> &i);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(ip_tables_lock, curcpu).lock);
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> if (cpu == curcpu)
> continue;
> i = 0;
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(ip_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
> t->size,
> add_entry_to_counter,
> counters,
> &i);
> - }
> -
> -}
> -
> -/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
> - * and everything is OK. */
> -static int
> -add_counter_to_entry(struct ipt_entry *e,
> - const struct xt_counters addme[],
> - unsigned int *i)
> -{
> - ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
> -
> - (*i)++;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* Take values from counters and add them back onto the current cpu */
> -static void put_counters(struct xt_table_info *t,
> - const struct xt_counters counters[])
> -{
> - unsigned int i, cpu;
> -
> - local_bh_disable();
> - cpu = smp_processor_id();
> - i = 0;
> - IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
> - t->size,
> - add_counter_to_entry,
> - counters,
> - &i);
> - local_bh_enable();
> -}
> -
> -
> -static inline int
> -zero_entry_counter(struct ipt_entry *e, void *arg)
> -{
> - e->counters.bcnt = 0;
> - e->counters.pcnt = 0;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -clone_counters(struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const struct xt_table_info *info)
> -{
> - unsigned int cpu;
> - const void *loc_cpu_entry = info->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
> -
> - memcpy(newinfo, info, offsetof(struct xt_table_info, entries));
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - memcpy(newinfo->entries[cpu], loc_cpu_entry, info->size);
> - IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(newinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->size,
> - zero_entry_counter, NULL);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(ip_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -979,7 +942,6 @@ static struct xt_counters * alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
> unsigned int countersize;
> struct xt_counters *counters;
> struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
> - struct xt_table_info *info;
>
> /* We need atomic snapshot of counters: rest doesn't change
> (other than comefrom, which userspace doesn't care
> @@ -988,30 +950,11 @@ static struct xt_counters * alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
> counters = vmalloc_node(countersize, numa_node_id());
>
> if (counters == NULL)
> - goto nomem;
> -
> - info = xt_alloc_table_info(private->size);
> - if (!info)
> - goto free_counters;
> -
> - clone_counters(info, private);
> -
> - mutex_lock(&table->lock);
> - xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(private, info);
> - synchronize_net(); /* Wait until smoke has cleared */
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - get_counters(info, counters);
> - put_counters(private, counters);
> - mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
> -
> - xt_free_table_info(info);
> + get_counters(private, counters);
>
> return counters;
> -
> - free_counters:
> - vfree(counters);
> - nomem:
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -1377,6 +1320,18 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
> + * and everything is OK. */
> +static int
> +add_counter_to_entry(struct ipt_entry *e,
> + const struct xt_counters addme[],
> + unsigned int *i)
> +{
> + ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
> +
> + (*i)++;
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> static int
> do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len, int compat)
> @@ -1386,7 +1341,7 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len, int compat
> struct xt_counters *paddc;
> unsigned int num_counters;
> const char *name;
> - int size;
> + int cpu, size;
> void *ptmp;
> struct xt_table *t;
> const struct xt_table_info *private;
> @@ -1437,25 +1392,25 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len, int compat
> goto free;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&t->lock);
> private = t->private;
> if (private->number != num_counters) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock_up_free;
> }
>
> - preempt_disable();
> - i = 0;
> /* Choose the copy that is on our node */
> - loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
> + cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(ip_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> + loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[cpu];
> + i = 0;
> IPT_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_entry,
> private->size,
> add_counter_to_entry,
> paddc,
> &i);
> - preempt_enable();
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(ip_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> +
> unlock_up_free:
> - mutex_unlock(&t->lock);
> xt_table_unlock(t);
> module_put(t->me);
> free:
> @@ -2272,7 +2227,10 @@ static struct pernet_operations ip_tables_net_ops = {
>
> static int __init ip_tables_init(void)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int cpu, ret;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(ip_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
>
> ret = register_pernet_subsys(&ip_tables_net_ops);
> if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
> index 800ae85..5b03479 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
> @@ -329,6 +329,12 @@ static void trace_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> #endif
>
> +struct rec_lock {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + int count; /* recursion count */
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rec_lock, ip6_tables_lock);
> +
> /* Returns one of the generic firewall policies, like NF_ACCEPT. */
> unsigned int
> ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -347,6 +353,7 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct xt_table_info *private;
> struct xt_match_param mtpar;
> struct xt_target_param tgpar;
> + struct rec_lock *rl;
>
> /* Initialization */
> indev = in ? in->name : nulldevname;
> @@ -367,7 +374,12 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> rcu_read_lock_bh();
> private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
> - table_base = rcu_dereference(private->entries[smp_processor_id()]);
> +
> + rl = &__get_cpu_var(ip_tables_lock);
> + if (likely(rl->count++ == 0))
> + spin_lock(&rl->lock);
> +
> + table_base = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
>
> e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
>
> @@ -467,6 +479,8 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
> ((struct ip6t_entry *)table_base)->comefrom = NETFILTER_LINK_POISON;
> #endif
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
> + if (likely(--rl->count == 0))
> + spin_unlock(&rl->lock);
>
> #ifdef DEBUG_ALLOW_ALL
> return NF_ACCEPT;
> @@ -931,73 +945,25 @@ get_counters(const struct xt_table_info *t,
> curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> i = 0;
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(ip6_tables_lock, curcpu).lock);
> IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[curcpu],
> t->size,
> set_entry_to_counter,
> counters,
> &i);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(ip6_tables_lock, curcpu).lock);
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> if (cpu == curcpu)
> continue;
> i = 0;
> + spin_lock_bh(&per_cpu(ip6_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
> t->size,
> add_entry_to_counter,
> counters,
> &i);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
> - * and everything is OK. */
> -static int
> -add_counter_to_entry(struct ip6t_entry *e,
> - const struct xt_counters addme[],
> - unsigned int *i)
> -{
> - ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
> -
> - (*i)++;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/* Take values from counters and add them back onto the current cpu */
> -static void put_counters(struct xt_table_info *t,
> - const struct xt_counters counters[])
> -{
> - unsigned int i, cpu;
> -
> - local_bh_disable();
> - cpu = smp_processor_id();
> - i = 0;
> - IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(t->entries[cpu],
> - t->size,
> - add_counter_to_entry,
> - counters,
> - &i);
> - local_bh_enable();
> -}
> -
> -static inline int
> -zero_entry_counter(struct ip6t_entry *e, void *arg)
> -{
> - e->counters.bcnt = 0;
> - e->counters.pcnt = 0;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -clone_counters(struct xt_table_info *newinfo, const struct xt_table_info *info)
> -{
> - unsigned int cpu;
> - const void *loc_cpu_entry = info->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
> -
> - memcpy(newinfo, info, offsetof(struct xt_table_info, entries));
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - memcpy(newinfo->entries[cpu], loc_cpu_entry, info->size);
> - IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(newinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->size,
> - zero_entry_counter, NULL);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&per_cpu(ip6_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1006,7 +972,6 @@ static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
> unsigned int countersize;
> struct xt_counters *counters;
> struct xt_table_info *private = table->private;
> - struct xt_table_info *info;
>
> /* We need atomic snapshot of counters: rest doesn't change
> (other than comefrom, which userspace doesn't care
> @@ -1015,30 +980,11 @@ static struct xt_counters *alloc_counters(struct xt_table *table)
> counters = vmalloc_node(countersize, numa_node_id());
>
> if (counters == NULL)
> - goto nomem;
> -
> - info = xt_alloc_table_info(private->size);
> - if (!info)
> - goto free_counters;
> -
> - clone_counters(info, private);
> -
> - mutex_lock(&table->lock);
> - xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(private, info);
> - synchronize_net(); /* Wait until smoke has cleared */
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - get_counters(info, counters);
> - put_counters(private, counters);
> - mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
> -
> - xt_free_table_info(info);
> + get_counters(private, counters);
>
> return counters;
> -
> - free_counters:
> - vfree(counters);
> - nomem:
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -1405,6 +1351,19 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* We're lazy, and add to the first CPU; overflow works its fey magic
> + * and everything is OK. */
> +static int
> +add_counter_to_entry(struct ip6t_entry *e,
> + const struct xt_counters addme[],
> + unsigned int *i)
> +{
> + ADD_COUNTER(e->counters, addme[*i].bcnt, addme[*i].pcnt);
> +
> + (*i)++;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
> int compat)
> @@ -1465,25 +1424,26 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len,
> goto free;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&t->lock);
> private = t->private;
> if (private->number != num_counters) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto unlock_up_free;
> }
>
> - preempt_disable();
> - i = 0;
> + local_bh_disable();
> /* Choose the copy that is on our node */
> - loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[raw_smp_processor_id()];
> + spin_lock(&__get_cpu_var(ip6_tables_lock).lock);
> + loc_cpu_entry = private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
> + i = 0;
> IP6T_ENTRY_ITERATE(loc_cpu_entry,
> private->size,
> add_counter_to_entry,
> paddc,
> &i);
> - preempt_enable();
> + spin_unlock(&__get_cpu_var(ip6_tables_lock).lock);
> + local_bh_enable();
> +
> unlock_up_free:
> - mutex_unlock(&t->lock);
> xt_table_unlock(t);
> module_put(t->me);
> free:
> @@ -2298,7 +2258,10 @@ static struct pernet_operations ip6_tables_net_ops = {
>
> static int __init ip6_tables_init(void)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int cpu, ret;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(ip6_tables_lock, cpu).lock);
>
> ret = register_pernet_subsys(&ip6_tables_net_ops);
> if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
> index 509a956..adc1b11 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
> @@ -625,20 +625,6 @@ void xt_free_table_info(struct xt_table_info *info)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_free_table_info);
>
> -void xt_table_entry_swap_rcu(struct xt_table_info *oldinfo,
> - struct xt_table_info *newinfo)
> -{
> - unsigned int cpu;
> -
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - void *p = oldinfo->entries[cpu];
> - rcu_assign_pointer(oldinfo->entries[cpu], newinfo->entries[cpu]);
> - newinfo->entries[cpu] = p;
> - }
> -
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_table_entry_swap_rcu);
> -
> /* Find table by name, grabs mutex & ref. Returns ERR_PTR() on error. */
> struct xt_table *xt_find_table_lock(struct net *net, u_int8_t af,
> const char *name)
> @@ -682,26 +668,21 @@ xt_replace_table(struct xt_table *table,
> struct xt_table_info *newinfo,
> int *error)
> {
> - struct xt_table_info *oldinfo, *private;
> + struct xt_table_info *private;
>
> /* Do the substitution. */
> - mutex_lock(&table->lock);
> private = table->private;
> /* Check inside lock: is the old number correct? */
> if (num_counters != private->number) {
> duprintf("num_counters != table->private->number (%u/%u)\n",
> num_counters, private->number);
> - mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
> *error = -EAGAIN;
> return NULL;
> }
> - oldinfo = private;
> rcu_assign_pointer(table->private, newinfo);
> - newinfo->initial_entries = oldinfo->initial_entries;
> - mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
> + newinfo->initial_entries = private->initial_entries;
>
> - synchronize_net();
> - return oldinfo;
> + return private;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_replace_table);
>
> @@ -734,7 +715,6 @@ struct xt_table *xt_register_table(struct net *net, struct xt_table *table,
>
> /* Simplifies replace_table code. */
> table->private = bootstrap;
> - mutex_init(&table->lock);
>
> if (!xt_replace_table(table, 0, newinfo, &ret))
> goto unlock;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists