netdev - Re: IMQ bug: kernel reboot immediately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49F05502.7050504@trash.net>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:46:10 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC:	Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@...il.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	"Y. D." <duyuyang@...il.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IMQ bug: kernel reboot immediately

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> ...
>> Currently not, the conntrack association is done at a later point.
>> We could add a classifier or TC action that performs the lookup
>> during ingress classification.
> 
> BTW, some time ago I started to wonder how safe are those various
> ingress activities wrt. invalid packets, dropped later in ip_rcv().

Leaving aside the ipt action, I'm not aware of any problems caused
by ingress classification. Could you be more specific?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html