[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49F06F78.4030601@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:39:04 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: bond_slave_info_query() fix
Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:24:07PM CEST, dada1@...mosbay.com wrote:
>> bond_slave_info_query() should keep a read lock while accessing slave info,
>> or risk accessing stale data and corruption.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 63369b6..66697db 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -2213,33 +2213,27 @@ static int bond_slave_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifslave *in
>> {
>> struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
>> struct slave *slave;
>> - int i, found = 0;
>> + int i, ret = -ENODEV;
>>
>> - if (info->slave_id < 0) {
>> + if (info->slave_id < 0)
>> return -ENODEV;
>
> You can return ret; here since -ENODEV is there, but I don't know if it isn't
> against policy. Patch looks good anyway.
>
Yes, we can just delete this extra test, since requested slave_id wont
be found anyway if negative.
Thanks
[PATCH] bonding: bond_slave_info_query() fix
bond_slave_info_query() should keep a read lock while accessing slave info,
or risk accessing stale data and corruption.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 63369b6..67515b7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2213,33 +2213,24 @@ static int bond_slave_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifslave *in
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
struct slave *slave;
- int i, found = 0;
-
- if (info->slave_id < 0) {
- return -ENODEV;
- }
+ int i, res = -ENODEV;
read_lock(&bond->lock);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
if (i == (int)info->slave_id) {
- found = 1;
+ res = 0;
+ strcpy(info->slave_name, slave->dev->name);
+ info->link = slave->link;
+ info->state = slave->state;
+ info->link_failure_count = slave->link_failure_count;
break;
}
}
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
- if (found) {
- strcpy(info->slave_name, slave->dev->name);
- info->link = slave->link;
- info->state = slave->state;
- info->link_failure_count = slave->link_failure_count;
- } else {
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return res;
}
/*-------------------------------- Monitoring -------------------------------*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists