[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12275.1240498296@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:51:36 -0700
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: bond_slave_info_query() fix
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
>Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>> Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:24:07PM CEST, dada1@...mosbay.com wrote:
>>> bond_slave_info_query() should keep a read lock while accessing slave info,
>>> or risk accessing stale data and corruption.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> index 63369b6..66697db 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> @@ -2213,33 +2213,27 @@ static int bond_slave_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifslave *in
>>> {
>>> struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
>>> struct slave *slave;
>>> - int i, found = 0;
>>> + int i, ret = -ENODEV;
>>>
>>> - if (info->slave_id < 0) {
>>> + if (info->slave_id < 0)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> You can return ret; here since -ENODEV is there, but I don't know if it isn't
>> against policy. Patch looks good anyway.
>>
>
>Yes, we can just delete this extra test, since requested slave_id wont
>be found anyway if negative.
>
>Thanks
>
>[PATCH] bonding: bond_slave_info_query() fix
>
>bond_slave_info_query() should keep a read lock while accessing slave info,
>or risk accessing stale data and corruption.
I don't think that's actually true, since changes to the data
being referenced are (should be) protected by RTNL, and
bond_slave_info_query runs via ioctl, and is holding RTNL.
Nevertheless, the patch does make the function cleaner, so I
have no objections.
-J
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
>Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 63369b6..67515b7 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -2213,33 +2213,24 @@ static int bond_slave_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifslave *in
> {
> struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> struct slave *slave;
>- int i, found = 0;
>-
>- if (info->slave_id < 0) {
>- return -ENODEV;
>- }
>+ int i, res = -ENODEV;
>
> read_lock(&bond->lock);
>
> bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
> if (i == (int)info->slave_id) {
>- found = 1;
>+ res = 0;
>+ strcpy(info->slave_name, slave->dev->name);
>+ info->link = slave->link;
>+ info->state = slave->state;
>+ info->link_failure_count = slave->link_failure_count;
> break;
> }
> }
>
> read_unlock(&bond->lock);
>
>- if (found) {
>- strcpy(info->slave_name, slave->dev->name);
>- info->link = slave->link;
>- info->state = slave->state;
>- info->link_failure_count = slave->link_failure_count;
>- } else {
>- return -ENODEV;
>- }
>-
>- return 0;
>+ return res;
> }
>
> /*-------------------------------- Monitoring -------------------------------*/
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists