netdev - [PATCH] bonding: ignore updelay param when there is no active slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090424135728.GA12304@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:57:29 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: [PATCH] bonding: ignore updelay param when there is no active slave

Pointed out by Sean E. Millichamp.

Quote from Documentation/networking/bonding.txt:
"Note that when a bonding interface has no active links, the
driver will immediately reuse the first link that goes up, even if the
updelay parameter has been specified (the updelay is ignored in this
case).  If there are slave interfaces waiting for the updelay timeout
to expire, the interface that first went into that state will be
immediately reused.  This reduces down time of the network if the
value of updelay has been overestimated, and since this occurs only in
cases with no connectivity, there is no additional penalty for
ignoring the updelay."

This patch actually changes the behaviour in this way.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>

 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 63369b6..da6106b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2249,6 +2249,9 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct slave *slave;
 	int i, link_state, commit = 0;
+	bool ignore_updelay;
+
+	ignore_updelay = !bond->curr_active_slave ? true : false;
 
 	bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
 		slave->new_link = BOND_LINK_NOCHANGE;
@@ -2313,6 +2316,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
 				       ": %s: link status up for "
 				       "interface %s, enabling it in %d ms.\n",
 				       bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name,
+				       ignore_updelay ? 0 :
 				       bond->params.updelay *
 				       bond->params.miimon);
 			}
@@ -2331,9 +2335,13 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
 				continue;
 			}
 
+			if (ignore_updelay)
+				slave->delay = 0;
+
 			if (slave->delay <= 0) {
 				slave->new_link = BOND_LINK_UP;
 				commit++;
+				ignore_updelay = false;
 				continue;
 			}
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html