lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:58:03 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: jpirko@...hat.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, fubar@...ibm.com, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: ignore updelay param when there is no active slave From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:57:29 +0200 > Pointed out by Sean E. Millichamp. > > Quote from Documentation/networking/bonding.txt: > "Note that when a bonding interface has no active links, the > driver will immediately reuse the first link that goes up, even if the > updelay parameter has been specified (the updelay is ignored in this > case). If there are slave interfaces waiting for the updelay timeout > to expire, the interface that first went into that state will be > immediately reused. This reduces down time of the network if the > value of updelay has been overestimated, and since this occurs only in > cases with no connectivity, there is no additional penalty for > ignoring the updelay." > > This patch actually changes the behaviour in this way. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> Applied to net-next-2.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists