netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090506.134003.261424694.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 06 May 2009 13:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	wd@...x.de
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, jrigby@...escale.com, kosmo@...ihalf.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	jcrigby@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.

Would you be offended if I tell you that this is a horrible patch
submission?

Your introductory email indicates 16 patches, yet the series indicates
there were 12, and that intro email is only posted to the linuxppc-dev
list for people to read.  Nobody on netdev nor other interested
parties that get CC:'d along the line are able to read what this patch
series is about.

Since only some patches are CC:'d to netdev I have no idea if I should
apply these or they are dependent on some other patches in the series
that you didn't send here to netdev.

What a mess... how can any maintainer figure out what patch is what,
and what tree you expect these patches to even get applied to?

I'm definitely sending all of the copies I have received to /dev/null,
you need to submit this work properly.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html