[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A01F602.2010601@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:41:38 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
CC: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@...ihalf.com>,
John Rigby <jrigby@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support.
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> +/*
> + * Define the buffer descriptor structure.
> + */
> +typedef struct bufdesc {
> + ushort cbd_sc; /* Control and status info */
> + ushort cbd_datlen; /* Data length */
> + uint cbd_bufaddr; /* Buffer address */
> +} cbd_t;
> +
> +/*
> + * The following definitions courtesy of commproc.h, which where
> + * Copyright (c) 1997 Dan Malek (dmalek@....net).
> + */
> +#define BD_SC_WRAP ((ushort)0x2000)
> +
> +/*
> + * Buffer descriptor control/status used by Ethernet receive.
> + */
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_EMPTY ((ushort)0x8000)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_WRAP ((ushort)0x2000)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_INTR ((ushort)0x1000)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_LAST ((ushort)0x0800)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_FIRST ((ushort)0x0400)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_MISS ((ushort)0x0100)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_LG ((ushort)0x0020)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_NO ((ushort)0x0010)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_SH ((ushort)0x0008)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_CR ((ushort)0x0004)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_OV ((ushort)0x0002)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_CL ((ushort)0x0001)
> +#define BD_ENET_RX_STATS ((ushort)0x013f) /* All status bits */
> +
> +/*
> + * Buffer descriptor control/status used by Ethernet transmit.
> + */
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_READY ((ushort)0x8000)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_PAD ((ushort)0x4000)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_WRAP ((ushort)0x2000)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_INTR ((ushort)0x1000)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_LAST ((ushort)0x0800)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_TC ((ushort)0x0400)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_DEF ((ushort)0x0200)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_HB ((ushort)0x0100)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_LC ((ushort)0x0080)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_RL ((ushort)0x0040)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_UN ((ushort)0x0002)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_CSL ((ushort)0x0001)
> +#define BD_ENET_TX_STATS ((ushort)0x03ff) /* All status bits */
All of the above is duplicative (with even the same names) of stuff in
asm/cpm.h. Beyond just the duplication, what happens if both CPM2 and
512x are enabled in the same kernel?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists