[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090519230551.GA20555@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:05:51 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dada1@...mosbay.com, jarkao2@...il.com, lav@....ru,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 13339] New: rtable leak in ipv4/route.c
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 03:05:17PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:24:50 -0400
>
> >> Moving whole group in front would defeat the purpose of move, actually,
> >> since rank in chain is used to decay the timeout in garbage collector.
> >> (search for tmo >>= 1; )
> >>
> > Argh, so the list is implicitly ordered by expiration time. That
> > really defeats the entire purpose of doing grouping in the ilst at
> > all. If thats the case, then I agree, its probably better to to
> > take the additional visitation hit in in check_expire above than to
> > try and preserve ordering.
>
> Yes, this seems best.
>
> I was worried that somehow the ordering also influences lookups,
> because the TOS bits don't go into the hash so I worried that it would
> be important that explicit TOS values appear before wildcard ones.
> But it doesn't appear that this is an issue, we don't have wildcard
> TOSs in the rtable entries, they are always explicit.
>
> So I would like to see an explicit final patch from Eric so we can get
> this fixed now.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Agreed, thanks once again for educating me Eric!
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists